CMS Launches New Search Tool for Open Payments Database; Announces Disputed Payments Reporting Deadline

As we discussed here, the launch of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Open Payments database on September 30, 2014 was met with a high level of criticism from industry, health care professionals, the media and other interested parties.  One significant complaint was that the data was not easily searchable.  Late last week, CMS provided a search tool option where users can search “identified data” for physicians, teaching hospitals, or companies using name, city, state or specialty.  “Identified data” is data that (i) was matched by CMS to a single doctor or teaching hospital, and (ii) available for review and dispute for 45 days.  However, as we previously discussed, a significant quantity of the data launched on September 30th was deidentified and, thus, not available using this search tool.

CMS also announced that applicable manufacturers and group purchasing organizations (GPOs) have until close of business on Friday, October 31st to make corrections to any 2013 Open Payments disputed records for publication this year.  Although data corrections can be performed in the Open Payments system at any time, any corrective action taken by October 31st will be reflected in a refreshed data publication on or before December 31, 2014.  Significantly, however, if a data correction results in a change to the covered recipient, any records are submitted to the Open Payments system for the first time, or any records currently on display are modified, the data will NOT be published as part of the December 31st data refresh because the data will not have undergone a review and dispute period.

 

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Federal Transparency

Business Forward Hosts HHS’s Director of Private Sector Engagement for a Discussion on Health Care for Small Businesses

On Wednesday, October 15, 2014, Business Forward hosted a discussion with Rhett Buttle, the Director of Private Sector Engagement at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Mr. Buttle began by providing background on the Affordable Care Act and then opened the line for questions. During Mr. Buttle’s discussion of the Affordable Care Act, he stated that there are three “big buckets” to think about when discussing its implementation: (1) affordability, (2) access and (3) quality. Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under Health Reform, The Affordable Care Act

PhRMA Challenges HRSA Interpretative Rule on Orphan Drugs in the 340B Drug Discount Program

On October 9, 2014, the Pharmaceutical Research & Manufacturers of America (“PhRMA”) filed a lawsuit seeking to enjoin the Health Resources Services Administration (“HRSA”) from implementing its July 23, 2014 “Interpretive Rule” regarding orphan drugs in the 340B Drug Discount Program (the “2014 Interpretive Rule”).  PhRMA’s lawsuit alleges that the 2014 Interpretive Rule “violates the plain language of the statutory orphan drug exclusion” and should be invalidated as “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.”  The lawsuit is pending before the D.C. District Court.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under 340B, Government Pricing, Litigation

9th Circuit Upholds Alameda County Manufacturer-Funded Drug Disposal Ordinance

On September 30, 2014, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit unanimously upheld a lower court’s finding that a California county ordinance requiring prescription drug manufacturers to operate and finance certain drug disposal operations was constitutional.  The plaintiffs-appellants in Pharm. Research & Mfrs. of Am v. County of Alameda (9th Cir., No. 3:12-cv-06203-RS) were comprised of the major pharmaceutical and biologic industry trade organizations in the United States.  Specifically, the Pharmaceutical Research & Manufactures of America (“PhRMA”), the Generic Pharmaceutical Association (“GPhA”) and the Biotechnology Industry Organization (“BIO”) alleged that Alameda County, California’s “Safe Drug Disposal” ordinance unconstitutionally violated the Commerce Clause by requiring interstate drug manufacturers to conduct and pay for Alameda County’s drug disposal program.  The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed, concluding:

“Opinions vary widely as to whether adoption of the Ordinance was a good idea. We leave that debate to other institutions and the public at large. We needed only to review the Ordinance and determine whether it violates the dormant Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. We did; it does not.”

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under Corporate Compliance, Litigation, Sales & Marketing

Sunshine Act Media Coverage and CMS’s Response Today

The Open Payments database has been live for a week now.  There has been media coverage, but most has not been the type that many expected.  The coverage to date has largely centered on the significant challenges associated with accessing and using the database.  For example:

US News & World Report: Doctor Payments Show Little Value at Launch Time

Media Health Partners: Open Payments Site Launches to User Complaints

MedPage Today: Sunshine Act Database Debuts to Skepticism

Policy and Medicine: Physician Payments Sunshine Act: Open Payments Is….Live? 

Continue reading

1 Comment

Filed under Federal Transparency

FDA Issues Final Cybersecurity Guidance for Medical Devices

On October 1 the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued final guidance regarding cybersecurity for medical devices. The FDA guidelines urge device manufacturers to include safety controls on devices to prevent cyber threats and recommend manufacturers outline the necessary steps that will be taken if their devices are found to be vulnerable to breaches. This guidance finalizes the draft guidance published last year published in response to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s warning about cyber-attacks on medical devices. Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under FDA, FDA Final Guidance, Health IT, Technology, Uncategorized

OIG Releases Proposed Rule re: Beneficiary Inducements and Gainsharing Revisions

The Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (OIG) released today a proposed rule titled, Medicare and State Health Care Programs: Fraud and Abuse; Revisions to Safe Harbors under the Anti-Kickback Statute, and Civil Monetary Penalty Rules Regarding Beneficiary Inducements and Gainsharing.  The 94-page proposed rule is expected to be published tomorrow in the Federal Register.  The proposed rule would amend the safe harbors to the federal Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS); codify changes to the definition of “remuneration” in the Civil Monetary Penalties (CMP) regulations; and codify the gainsharing CMP provided in 42 U.S.C. 1320a–7a(b). Comments to the proposed rule must be submitted to the OIG within 60 days of publication in the Federal Register.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under DHHS OIG, Fraud and Abuse, OIG Guidance