Around 2 a.m., the Senate voted along party lines to confirm Representative Tom Price to become Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services. The vote was 52-47 with no Democrats voting in favor. With repeated attacks on his policy record and questions about stock purchases, Price’s nomination was among the most controversial of President Trump’s cabinet selections. With Price in place, now comes the work to fill out other key roles at HHS and develop the administrative process repeal and replace of Obamacare. Continue reading
Tag Archives: CMS
On Thursday, the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) announced that it would not move forward with its controversial Medicare Part B Payment Model (Part B Demo). The Part B Demo had come under heavy fire from industry groups, some patient organizations, providers and a bipartisan collection of policymakers in Congress. Continue reading
On Friday, October 14th, the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released the long-anticipated final rule with 60-day comment period (Rule) for the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) Quality Payment Program (QPP). The QPP provides incentive payments for participation in Advanced Alternative Payment Models (Advanced APM). The provisions of the 2,400 page Rule take effect January 1, 2017. When fully implemented, the Rule will generally transition providers from the current fee-for-service payment system into new value-based payment models. Continue reading
As Washington speeds towards Election Day on November 8th, it is a good time to examine the status of the key legislative and policy issues impacting the healthcare and life sciences sectors. Congress has few legislative working days remaining in 2016, but could make some headway on legislation to promote innovation as well as prevent certain rulemakings like the Medicare Part B demonstration project. In addition to closing out existing priories, Congress will turn its attention to new and recurring issues such as increasing the amount of generic drugs. Here is an overview of what’s left to be done this year during the “lame duck” session that begins in mid-November and what is on the horizon for 2017.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) recently announced in the 2017 Physician Fee Schedule proposed rule that since publication and implementation of the Open Payments Final Rule and the 2015 Physician Fee Schedule, various stakeholders have provided feedback to CMS regarding aspects of the Open Payment program, including identification of certain areas that may benefit from revision. Thus, CMS is soliciting comments to inform future rulemaking, but made it clear that it was not intending to finalize any Open Payments requirements directly as a result of the 2017 Physician Fee Schedule.
To further discuss the topics listed in the 2017 Physician Fee Schedule, CMS held today a Special Open Door Forum for industry stakeholders “to inform future rulemaking and other enhancements” to the Open Payments program. CMS provided a presentation slide deck for the Open Door Forum, which outlined various topics in which it was soliciting stakeholder feedback, including:
Health care policy issues continue to stream out of Congress and the Administration. The Senate held a markup of various health bills as part of its effort to produce a companion to the House of Representatives-passed 21st Century Cures legislation and CMS released long awaited Medicare Advantage rates. Continue reading
Published today in the Federal Register was a long-awaited Final Rule implementing a requirement from the 2010 Affordable Care Act requiring Medicare Part A and B providers and suppliers to report and return overpayments to Medicare by the later of 60 days after the date an overpayment was identified, or the due date of any corresponding cost report, if applicable (Overpayment Rule). The Proposed Rule was previously published on February 16, 2012. Additionally, the final rule implementing overpayments in Medicare Parts C and D was previously published in May 2014. Case law interpreting the Overpayment Rule has been limited to date.
The Final Rule includes several significant clarifications, including the following: