Late last week, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced that it was once again delaying implementation of the final rule issued January 9, 2017 related to amendments to its regulations regarding intended use (Final Rule). This implementation delay follows a Petition to Stay and for Reconsideration (Petition) filed February 8, 2017 by the Medical Information Working Group (MIWG), the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), and the Biotechnology Innovation Organization (BIO). The Petition argued that the Final Rule’s inclusion of a “totality of the evidence” standard is a new standard not found in the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) or case law related to intended use and was promulgated in violation in the APA because parties subject to this significant liability standard did not receive fair notice or a meaningful opportunity to comment.
Tag Archives: Food and Drug Administration
A notice was published today in the Federal Register regarding a two day public hearing that will be held on November 9-10, 2016 by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to obtain input from a wide range of stakeholders regarding communications by industry related to unapproved uses of FDA-regulated drugs, biological products and medical devices (collectively, “Medical Products”). The announcement noted that FDA has been engaged in a comprehensive review of its regulations and policies related to off-label communications of approved or cleared Medical Products since 2014, and input from the meeting will further inform FDA’s policy development.
All is Well: FDA to Host Webinar on its Final Guidance for Low-Risk General Wellness Devices on September 1, 2016
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently released final version of its guidance, General Wellness: Policy for Low-Risk Devices (Policy), with a webinar slated for September 1st as part of the rollout. While not much has changed from the 2015 draft guidance, the number of mobile apps and general wellness products that are pushing the limits of what the FDA believes could be “devices” under the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) increases daily.
In order to fit under the FDA Policy, the product needs to both solely marketed for general wellness and present a low risk of safety to the user and other persons. The guidance provides useful examples that anticipate the desire to help “reduce the risk of” or “live well with” chronic conditions, the most interesting boundaries of the Policy for those wishing to differentiate themselves within the wellness industry.
Agency metrics on the 513(g) Requests for Information may provide some feedback on the impact of the Policy since its draft issuance, and future enforcement needs to be monitored for defining the limits of the Policy.
Chairwoman Edith Ramirez of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced the release of new guidance directed towards developers of mobile health apps (the “Guidance”), while speaking today at the International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) conference in Washington, DC. The Guidance is a tool created in collaboration with the FTC, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to assist app developers in determining what laws and regulations apply to their products. Continue reading
Late last week, Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) wrote to the leaders of Johnson & Johnson, GE Healthcare, Siemens USA, Medtronic and Philips USA, to “express serious concerns” about potential cybersecurity vulnerabilities in their medical devices. From the letter, the rationale for selecting these companies is that together they “control more than one-quarter of the global medical device market” and it is her hope that they can send “a signal” to the broader medical device industry. Continue reading
On Tuesday, the Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) issued an Advisory Opinion regarding a program to provide a 30-day supply of cancer drugs free of costs to patients who experience an insurance coverage determination delay of at least five business days (the Free Supply Program). The OIG concluded that although the Free Supply Program could potentially generate prohibited remuneration under the federal health care program anti-kickback statute (AKS) (42 U.S.C. 1320a-7b(b), the OIG would not impose administrative sanctions against the two requestors, pharmaceutical companies that co-promote the drug, in connection with this arrangement.